More
Contact
Submit
PremiumVIVAnews -sale of electronic goods through your social networking community was long done. That way it can be said is easy and practical. But the way such sales now becomes a problem, could even dipindanakan.
It is against Dian Yudha State and Randy Lester Samu when they sell the iPad tablet computer through social networking pages, which finally ended Kaskus in prison.
According to the power law of Dian and Randy, Virza Roy Hizzal, a case that ravaged his clients today are very strange. Therefore, the sale of electronic goods which do not have a manual Language Indonesia is pretty much done.
"What is the Intention that the police conduct an investigation? So, who to report it is not clear, so the police seemed to be too creative for this case, "said Virza VIVAnews currently found in Jakarta, Sunday 2 July 2011.
Virza explaining Consumer legislation, which threatened to his clients is not fundamental. The reason, incognito method carried out by the police to arrest his client was not a consumer. The police could even say consumers false.
He argued, the existence of a legal jump received his client by using the consumer because the case did not wear mechanism of businessmen and consumers.
"I wish if consumers could use the original, he objected to the method in the consumer and there are mechanisms of complaint. This means that there is room in the middle of the consumer. Where can I find the civil code that should be primarily settled, but these were ignored and outright is liable, "he explained.
Virza, the case is the alleged orders from competitors electronics of competing in the corporate world. What these goods are mushrooming in the tablet amsyarakat.
The case began when Dian and Rendy offers 2 pieces iPad 3 g 64 GB Wi Fi in buying and selling forum site www.kaskus.us, which was a member of the police officers posing as buyers and make transactions on November 24, 2010 at City Walk, Tanah Abang, Central Jakarta. After that the two were arrested for allegedly selling illegal goods through the internet.
Both were indicted by the Prosecutor by article 8 paragraph 1 letter a of ACT No. 8/1999 regarding the protection of consumers and of article 52, paragraph 32 of the ACT junto No. 36/1999 of Telecommunications with the threat of criminal punishment for 5 years. (ren)
View the original article here
